Raising Gifted Parents
  • Home
  • Lessons
  • About
  • Home
  • Lessons
  • About
Raising Gifted Parents

It's All In the Eyebrows!

1/6/2026

 
If you want to know how someone is feeling, look at their eyebrows. Look at the examples in the three rows below. Before scrolling down, what do you think each face is feeling?
Picture

Picture
Look at each column to see how the same eyes and mouths with different eyebrows to see how much of a difference they can make:
Picture
Try it for yourself! Experiment with 

Work at Alcatraz

1/4/2026

 
This article has been adapted from a National Parks Service article that is no longer published. It has been changed only to simplify vocabulary for young readers.
Keeping inmates constructively occupied is vital to prison security. The busier an inmate is, the less time to plan or commit infractions. Tension and violence is reduced. Many prison programs are designed to prepare inmates for successful reintegration into the community as law-abiding citizens after release.

Although Alcatraz inmates were more closely supervised and controlled than inmates at other prisons, the facility offered an array of work, education, and recreation programs.

Work

Federal inmates are required to work, unless they are medically unable to, or are violent or disruptive. At Alcatraz, work included factory work, laundry, general prison maintenance, and food preparation.

Inmates received nominal wages. As cash can be a dangerous commodity in the prison, wages were credited to individual accounts in the prison trust fund. Inmates drew on their accounts to buy from the prison commissary, pay fines, or send funds to their families. Any remaining balance was paid out in cash when the inmate was released.
Picture
Picture
Inmates generally were not permitted on the Alcatraz dock, so correctional officers loaded the incoming laundry from boats onto trucks, for transport to the Alcatraz laundry.
Federal Prison Industries (FPI) is a government-owned corporation that provides products and services using inmate labor. FPI sells only to federal agencies to avoid competing against private sector businesses and labor. The Alcatraz prison factory produced furniture, ashtrays, lamps, and brushes, as well as rubber mats for US Navy battleships. Inmates did laundry for military bases in the San Francisco area. They also made suits for inmates being released, and destitute veterans. Other jobs were part of routine prison operations. Inmates prepared food. They repaired shoes, roads and sidewalks, swept, waxed and polished concrete cell house floors, mowed lawns, tended shrubs, installed glass, and did electrical work, carpentry, and plumbing.

Many assigned work activities involved vocational training. By the 1930s, federal prisons offered academic educational courses. Unlike other federal prisons, Alcatraz did not offer actual classroom instruction. Instead, inmates could select from a wide variety of accredited correspondence courses.

What Does the Expression "The wrong side of town" mean?

12/30/2025

 
In literature, the expression “they live on the other side of town” (or “the wrong side of town”) is an example of figurative language, not just a description of location.

Meaning

The phrase usually means that a person or family lives in a part of town that is poorer, less respected, or treated unfairly by others. Writers use it to show social differences, such as money, power, or opportunity. It does not mean the people are bad or wrong. Instead, it shows how others judge them.

When authors say “the wrong side of town,” they are showing that some people believe one neighborhood is better than another. This belief is often unfair and helps the reader understand conflict or prejudice in the story.
Picture

Why authors Use This Expression

Authors use this phrase to:

  • Show class differences (rich vs. poor)
  • Show racial differeneces
  • Explain why characters may be treated differently
  • Create conflict between characters or groups
  • Help readers understand the society in the story

Important Idea for Readers

The expression teaches readers that judging people by where they live is unfair. Good authors often use this phrase to encourage readers to think critically and to show that a person’s value does not depend on their neighborhood.

1800s Travel in the US

12/29/2025

 

Rates of Travel Time 

In the early 1800s there were few roads and those that existed were nothing like we have now. To travel from New York City to Washington D.C. took several days. In 1811, construction on the National Road began. This road, paid for by the United States government, was to go from Cumberland, Maryland to Ohio. It was a stone-surfaced road that was maintained so that travel by foot, horse, or wagon was faster and easier. This road pushed westward until it was finished in 1839. 
Picture
Map of the National Road (Wikimedia Commons)
Robert Fulton's steamboat began traveling the Mississippi River in 1811 which made travel up and down the river easier for passengers and freight. Further improvements on the design of the steamboat increased the number of boats and, therefore, the number of passengers. In 1814, there were only 20 trips to New Orleans by steamboat. By 1834, there were 1,200!

The truly big advance in travel came with trains, however. In 1827, the first stone was laid for a railroad from Baltimore, Maryland to Ohio. Train travel was much faster than other forms of travel and spurs, or rails off of the main branch of the railroad, to smaller or out of the way towns became possible. Railroads were being built all over the country with the first coast-to-coast railroad being completed in 1869.

The tables below show how much improvement there was in the time it took to travel from New York City. The dark lines show travel time in weeks, the lighter color lines show travel time in days. If you look at the very southern (or bottom) tip of Florida, for example, you can see that it took about 3 weeks to travel there in 1830 since it is past the "2 wks." line. By 1830, it had improved to 2 weeks because it is past the "1 week" line. By 1857, it took only 4 days to travel to the southernmost tip of Florida as it is past the 3 day line.
Picture
Atlas of the Historical Geography of the United States (public domain)
Picture
Atlas of the Historical Geography of the United States (public domain)
Picture
Atlas of the Historical Geography of the United States (public domain)


Edwards, P. (2015, March 11). Travel time is the forgotten breakthrough of the past 200 years. Vox. https://www.vox.com/2015/3/11/8187033/maps-travel-time

Paullin, C. O. (1932). Atlas of the historical geography of the United States. Carnegie Institution of Wahington and the American Geographical Society of New York.
 https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiuo.ark:/13960/t4wj0r09x&seq=8

Steamboat . Britannica. (n.d.). https://www.britannica.com/technology/steamboat



Historical Cotton Prices in the US

12/29/2025

 
The following information is taken from the USDA, the Alabama Agricultural Museum, and Cornell University's data sets on crops. 

The following table is the price per pound for cotton. It is not adjusted for inflation, so these are the actual prices paid at the time.
Year : price in US dollars
1876 : $9.71
1877 : $8.53
1878 : $8.16
1879 : $10.28
1880 : $9.83
1881 : $10.66
1882 : $9.12
1883 : $9.13
1884 : $9.19
1885 : $8.39
1886 : $8.06
1887 : $8.55
1888 : $8.50
1889 : $8.55
1890 : $8.59
1891 : $7.24
1892 : $8.34
1893 : $7.00
1894 : $4.59
1895 : $7.62
1896 : $6.66
1897 : $6.68
1898 : $5.73
1899 : $6.98
1900 : $9.20
1901 : $7.00 
1902 : $7.60 
1903 : $10.49
1904 : $9.00 
1905 : $10.78
1906 : $9.60
1907 : $10.36
1908 : $9.00
1909 : $13.52
1910 : $13.96
1911 : $9.65
1912 : $11.50
1913 : $12.47
1914 : $7.35
1915 : $11.22
1916 : $17.36
1917 : $27.09
1918 : $28.88
1919 : $35.34
1920 : $15.89
1921 : $17.00
1922 : $22.88
1923 : $28.69
1924 : $22.91
1925 : $19.62
1926 : $12.49
1927 : $20.20
1928 : $17.98
1929 : $16.78
1930 : $9.46
1931 : $5.66
1932 : $6.52
1933 : $10.17
1934 : $12.36
1935 : $11.09
1936 : $12.36
1937 : $8.41
1938 : $8.60
1939 : $9.09
1940 : $9.89
1941 : $17.03
1942 : $19.05
1943 : $19.90
1944 : $20.73
1945 : $22.52
1946 : $32.64
1947 : $31.93
1948 : $30.38
1949 : $28.58
1950 : $40.07
1951 : $37.88
1952 : $34.59
1953 : $32.25
1954 : $33.61
1955 : $32.33
1956 : $31.75
1957 : $29.65
1958 : $33.23
1959 : $31.66
1960 : $30.19
1961 : $32.92
1962 : $31.90
1963 : $32.23
1964 : $31.07
1965 : $29.37
1966 : $21.75
1967 : $26.70
1968 : $23.11
1969 : $22.00
1970 : $21.98
1971 : $28.23
1972 : $27.30
1973 : $44.60
1974 : $42.90
1975 : $51.30
1976 : $64.10
1977 : $52.30
1978 : $58.40
1979 : $62.50
1980 : $74.70
1981 : $54.30
1982 : $59.60
1983 : $66.60
1984 : $58.90
1985 : $56.30
1986 : $52.40
1987 : $64.30
1988 : $56.60
1989 : $66.20
1990 : $68.20
1991 : $58.10
1992 : $54.90
1993 : $58.40
1994 : $72.00
1995 : $76.50
1996 : $70.50
1997 : $66.20
1998 : $61.70
1999 : $46.80
2000 : $51.60
2001 : $35.10

The Legend of the Charter Oak

12/26/2025

 
This article was originally published on the Connecticuthistory.org website. It was written by Erin Strogoff. It is no longer published on the Internet, and so has been republished here with some language changed to make it more kid friendly.
Many places in Connecticut share a similar name: Charter Oak Bridge, Charter Oak State College, Charter Oak Park. Why are so many places and things in Connecticut named “Charter Oak”? The name comes from one of Connecticut’s most famous legends.
Picture
The Charter Oak by Charles de Wolf Brownell (Wikimedia Commons)
In 1662, the colony of Connecticut, owned and governed by England, was granted a Royal Charter by King Charles II. The “Connecticut Charter” permitted the colony to make some of its own rules and to elect certain officials. After Charles’s death in 1685,  his brother, James II, became King. James disapproved of the Royal Charters and demanded their return. The charters interfered with James’s plan to establish the Dominion of New England—a combination of the New England colonies and the colony of New York under the leadership of one royal official.

In 1687, Sir Edmond Andros, the Royal Governor of the Dominion, met with leaders of the Connecticut colony in Hartford. Debates continued for hours as the colonists refused to give up the Charter. According to legend, all of the candles in the meeting house suddenly blew out and, during the confusion, the Charter disappeared. It was hidden in the trunk of a large white oak tree where it was protected from the King and from Andros.
Picture
Wikimedia Commons
Despite Connecticut’s efforts to resist, it became part of the Dominion of New England for the next two years. In 1689, James II was overthrown and Andros lost power in the colonies. The Connecticut Charter emerged from hiding and was used to govern Connecticut until 1818.

On August 21, 1856, the Charter Oak, estimated at nearly 1,000 years old, fell down during a violent storm. Because it was such an important part of Connecticut history, people used the wood to carve chess pieces, chairs, and many other items. Original artifacts made from its wood, along with numerous images, are on display at the Connecticut Historical Society.

George Washington's two birthdays

12/26/2025

 
Picture
Picture
Pope Gregory XIII (Wikimedia Commons)
In the Washington family bible, it lists George Washington's birth date as "the 11th day of February 1731/2." This strangely written year is because of the change from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar.

The Julian calendar was named after Julius Caesar who developed a calendar that was 364 1/4 days and closely matched the time it takes the earth to go around the sun from the beginning of spring to the beginning of spring (which was March 25th and when the year changed). Caesar's calendar was 365 days long, but included an extra day, or leap day, every four years to account for the extra 1/4 day.
Though this solved the problems in older calendars that were used, it wasn't quite accurate enough because the actual time between the beginning of one spring to the beginning of the next spring is 365 days 5 hours 48 minutes and 46 seconds. This means the Julian calendar was 11 minutes and 14 seconds too slow. This added up to a full day off every 128 years.

By the time Pope Gregory XIII came around in 1572, the calendar was off by ten days, so the first day of spring was happening earlier and earlier on the calendar but really should have been happening on the vernal equinox (Latin for "equal night"), which is the date in the spring when there is the same amount of daylight and darkness.

Pope Gregory did two things to fix the problem. First, though he kept the 365 day calendar with a leap day every four years, he added a new rule: there would be no leap year in years ending in "00" unless those years were divisible by 400. Therefore, the years 1700, 1800, 1900, and 2100 would not be a leap year but the years 1600 and 2000 would. This change was so accurate that today, scientists need only add leap seconds every few years to the clock in order to keep the calendar correct. Secondly, since the Julian calendar had fallen ten days behind over the centuries, Pope Gregory XIII said that October 4, 1582 would be officially followed by October 15, 1582. Not only would the new calendar be used, but ten days would be "lost" forever, and the new year would now begin on January 1 instead of March 25.

What does this have to do with Washington's birthday?

Though Pope Gregory's new "Gregorian calendar" was developed in 1572, it took centuries for it to be adopted worldwide. Great Britain finally decided to adopt the calendar in 1751 and their government said September 2, 1752 would be followed by September 14, 1752. Because they took so long to change to the new calendar, they had to add eleven days instead of ten. At that time, America was under British rule, so the American colonies changed their calendar then, too.

Because people were so aware of the changes, for many years after, dates were written using both the old and the new calendars. Before 1752, the new year began March 25, and after, it changed to January 1st. Therefore, Washington's birthday was in 1731 on the old calendar and 1732 on the new calendar since it was in February. And, since his birthday on the old calendar was February 11 and they added eleven days to the calendar, his birthday became February 22nd. 

Thomas Jefferson & George Washington

9/24/2025

 
Picture
Thomas Jefferson in his official presidential portrait, 1800
Picture
Portrait of Martha Washington, mid 1700s.
Martha Washington is said to have told a friend that the two saddest days of her life where the day her husband, George Washington, died, and the second was when Thomas Jefferson came to visit Mount Vernon. She told her friends that, after losing her husband, Jefferson’s visit was the most painful thing she had ever gone through.

Martha did not like Jefferson. He had often spoken badly about President Washington. Jefferson said Washington wanted too much power, like a king, and that he only followed Alexander Hamilton’s ideas. Jefferson even refused to go to Washington’s funeral. He told people in private that the country's "republican spirit" might return now that Washington was gone and the Federalists (people in Washington's political party) could no longer hide behind his heroic image.

But Washington and Jefferson had not always been enemies. Long before, they were friends and had much in common. Jefferson was born in 1743. Like Washington, he was tall and had red hair. Both men came from families of farmers. Jefferson went to William and Mary College, studied law, and then worked in government. He also became richer when he married a wealthy widow, Martha Wayles Skelton.

Jefferson called himself a farmer and spent much of his life caring for his land at Monticello, just as Washington cared for Mount Vernon. But the two men were most alike in their love for the American Revolution. In the Continental Congress, Jefferson was known for his great writing. His words are best remembered in the Declaration of Independence. Later, he helped make new laws in Virginia, became governor, and worked in the Congress again to open land in the west for settlers. In 1784, he was sent to France as an ambassador.

Secretary of state

Jefferson came back to the United States in November 1789 to work as Secretary of State for President Washington. Right away, he started having problems with Alexander Hamilton, who was Secretary of the Treasury. Jefferson did not agree with Hamilton’s plan to create the Bank of the United States. He thought it was against the rules of the Constitution.

At the same time, the French Revolution was getting more violent. Jefferson still wanted America to be allied, or have friendly reltions with France, but Hamilton wanted the country to be closer to Great Britain. Jefferson even started to think that Hamilton and his group, called the Federalists, wanted to bring back kings and queens in America. He also worried that President Washington was listening to Hamilton too much. In 1793, Jefferson resigned from Washington's cabinet.

 In 1796, as the leader of the Democratic-Republican Party, he became Vice President under John Adams and then was elected President in 1801. In his inaugural address, he called Washington “our first and greatest revolutionary character, whose preeminent services had entitled him to the first place in his country’s love.” Back at Mount Vernon, Martha Washington dismissed Jefferson's "sarcastic" remarks, claiming his election was the "greatest misfortune our nation has ever experienced." Jefferson served for two terms, with the 1803 Louisiana Purchase being his greatest accomplishment, before retiring to Virginia where he died in 1826.


Stockwell, M. (n.d.). Thomas Jefferson. George Washington’s Mount Vernon. https://web.archive.org/web/20210225054024/https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/thomas-jefferson/

Gehred, K. (2018, May 18). Did Martha Washington Really Hate Thomas Jefferson?. Washington Papers. https://washingtonpapers.org/did-martha-washington-really-hate-thomas-jefferson/





A Historian's View of Anderson's Fever 1793

12/16/2024

 
This webpage is from historian Bob Arnebeck's website that is no longer published, and is reprinted here, in its entirety, with his permission. A small amount of editing has been done to simplify vocabulary for young readers and remove links to other pages on his website, as they are no longer published.
by Bob Arnebeck
Historical fiction is a great way to learn about the past, and better yet, to get a feel for the past. Going through a novel and pointing out things that could not have happened somewhat misses the point of historical fiction. In the midst of the epidemic surely many people had a view of what was happening that was wrong. Isolated and fearful, how could anyone know what was really going on?

However, Philadelphians in the 1790s were careful to keep records of their city. Before the epidemic a directory was published that gave the name and occupation of every head of household, listing each house in each street. After the epidemic, a list of all the dead was compiled, and a street by street, alley by alley, tally of the fever deaths was made. During the epidemic, records were kept of admissions to Bush Hill hospital. Of course, we can't expect to find the fictional characters of Fever 1793 in these records. But we can get a better sense of the city at that time, even in regards to the most mundane things like the weather.

On August 16, 1793, Matilda Cook woke up moaning about another hot August day. Not far away Benjamin Rittenhouse kept a daily record of the temperature, wind direction and sky conditions at 6 am and 3 pm. Benjamin Rush thought weather was so important in trying to solve the mystery of the spread of yellow fever that he included the weather records for all of 1793 in his memoir of the epidemic.
Picture
So we actually know what the weather was, and that on the 15th it had not been a typical hot August day. At 3 pm it was 75 degrees and cloudy. At 6am on August 16 it was 70 degrees. So Matilda might have moaned about another muggy day, and while at 3pm, the temperature rose to 83 degrees, the wind shifted and came out of the north. Now this is nitpicking! But maybe not, with the causes of disease more mysterious in those days, many people thought wind direction had a great deal to do with health and moods.

The first dramatic event in Fever 1793 is the death of Polly

Picture
She is unable to come and work at the Cook Coffeehouse because the night before, August 15, she died suddenly at her parents' house on Third Street. At the Coffeehouse news of her death sets off speculation about the sickly state of the city, including deaths along the wharves and illness among refugees from the West Indies. [These refugees came from the country now known as Haiti. Refugees from that country are sometimes in the news today so it should be noted that the refugees in 1793 were by and large well-to-do French settlers fleeing to safety, some with well cared for slaves acting as personal servants.]
Not surprisingly in many letters written at that time, the yellow fever epidemic is a major topic. However, in those letters no special attention was paid to deaths in the city until the last ten days of August. Anderson makes the reason for this clear in her book: death by fever in August was not rare. Indeed, Polly Lear, the young wife of President Washington's personal secretary died suddenly in early August. Biographers have wondered in retrospect if she was not the earliest victim of yellow fever. However, from my reading of the letters, the illness most remarked on in mid-August was an epidemic of the flu which was spreading throughout the city and beyond. It was not fatal, only a nuisance to be wheezing and coughing in the summer. Some blamed the refugees for bringing that to the city. As late as August 22 Benjamin Rush was worrying more about the influenza epidemic than the few fever deaths in the city that came to his notice.

During and after the epidemic several doctors made a meticulous investigation of the fever deaths in early August to determine which might been caused by yellow fever. The earliest deaths were, by general consensus, deemed to be the deaths of two recent immigrants from Europe on August 6 and 8. Until the end of August both deaths were considered a mystery. Of course, it is possible that the general public gathered at coffeehouses were more aware of what was going on than the doctors. But there's no evidence for that.

Now, if someone like Polly had died suddenly on Third Street on August 15, would the doctors have included her among the early yellow fever victims? Probably not. Today the distance of three blocks seems insignificant. In the 18th century it was quite another matter, and rightly so. The Aedes aegypti mosquito which spreads yellow fever has a very limited range, under 500 feet. No one in the 18th century knew that but they were accustomed to the usual slow pace of the widening circle of infection as uninfected mosquitoes bit infected humans and thus became carriers of the disease giving it to the subsequent people they bit.

What first caused the panic in Philadelphia in 1793 was not the counting up of the number of deaths all over the city, it was the clustering of deaths of citizens of the city (not recent immigrants or refugees) and the violent nature of those deaths along the wharves. Rush, who lived just beyond Third Street on Walnut was at first perplexed at an early death he witnessed on Second Street, until he quizzed the family and learned the victim has been near the wharves frequently. Not until the last week of August, about August 26th, did families on Third Street get a sense that the fever had reached their door. Anderson makes good use of this in explaining why the Cook Coffeehouse was popular. It was over six blocks from the wharves. However, given the way people seemed to think in 1790s, if there was any suspicion that Polly had died of yellow fever, perhaps catching it as she visited the market for groceries, the coffeehouse where she worked would not have been popular. Indeed, it's likely that a real Mrs. Cook would have not have spoken about Polly's death at all, at least not to her customers.

We can get a pretty good gauge of when panic and flight would have definitely spread to the neighborhood of the Coffeehouse, because in real history, the Pennsylvania legislature was meeting nearby. They met on Wednesday August 28 and on Thursday adjourned until Monday. One reason was that, as one legislator wrote in his diary, "a young man by the name of Fry is lying dead at the west end of the State House." On Sunday evening, September 1, Dr. Rush was asked if it was wise for the legislature to convene. He advised against it and they met briefly only to adjourn and most members left the city.

One more brief point about the early days of the epidemic: the first group of people to be identified as particular victims of the fever were "young" men like Fry. Benjamin Rush wrote to his wife on September 1, "This evening I fear I shall lose a son of Joseph Stansbury, a sweet youth, a little older than our Richard. It has been particularly fatal to young people. I rejoice that our boys escaped from the city." Richard Rush was 13 years old. I kept expecting Matilda's boy friend, Nathaniel, to get the fever and die. By the way, I knew that Nathaniel's situation was largely fictional because his master, Charles Wilson Peale, was actually not in Philadelphia during the early part of the epidemic. He was down in Delaware Bay collecting specimens of birds, and returned to the city on September 16. Such are the little facts that historians learn by reading the letters written at the time of the crisis.

So a more likely scenario for Anderson's fictional heroine would have been for her to be unaware of any fevers until around August 22; then for her to hope, as many did, that the fever would not spread; and then for her to be in a panic when on August 28 her boyfriend Fry, who was the son of the doorkeeper of the State Assembly and thus a familiar figure in the neighborhood, died.

The Visit to the Newspaper Office

When characters in historical fiction visit the office of a real newspaper, the author quite lets historians in the door. Newspapers are one of the major sources used by historians, especially in studying events like an epidemic when things change day by day. Newspapers of that day combined several things, advertisements, of course, shipping news, letters from readers, copies of articles from out-of-town newspapers and foreign newspapers (often well out of date), and brief paragraphs written by the editor which often referred to current concerns. So we have a pretty good idea of what Andrew Brown, the newspaper editor whom Matilda's grandfather spoke with, was thinking during the epidemic. For example on August 31. Brown was "happy" to pass on "the assurances of several respectable physicians, that the progress of the infectious fever... is considerably abated." Matilda visited the office on Monday, September 2nd. What was on Brown's mind then? You can check copies of the Federal Gazette for that day.

Mrs. Cook's Treatments

Matilda's mother got sick on September 2 and is first treated by a "Mr." Rowley. Then she is treated again on September 6 by a Dr. Kerr. Typically in those days the mother or grandmother in a house was the first physician. Unlike today, all the remedies that doctors had were also available to anyone else. A coffeehouse, especially, might be expected to have a cabinet full of medicines for many complaints of the day, and someone like Mrs. Cook might be expected to know how to use them. Not having an adult female friend with her, when Mrs. Cook became incapacitated to the degree where she could not treat herself, her father-in-law would have to get the medical help needed. That he would get a layman with dirty hands who smelled of rum is rather unlikely. Eliza somewhat excuses that by explaining to Matilda that all the real doctors are busy down at the wharves where "they say bodies are piling up like firewood." Actually, doctors did not respond to emergencies in such a fashion. Their first loyalty was always to the families they served. A system was in place that made the services of younger doctors available to those who did not have a family physician. A likely candidate for the Cook family doctor would have been Dr. Wistar who lived and worked a block or so away until he got the fever.

As it turns out Mr. Rowley prescribed a bath which was at that time one of the treatments for yellow fever. Baths were not common in Philadelphia in 1793, and giving a patient a bath every four hours was indeed drastic treatment. A more likely treatment, popular for a summer flu, was to soak the feet and sip camomile tea. When Dr. Kerr is summoned on September 6, Mrs. Cook is still unwell and lethargic. He says she has yellow fever and because her pulse is fast and strong, she must be bled because Dr. Rush advised such treatment.

Actually on September 6, Rush had not yet advised bleeding. One French doctor was bleeding yellow fever patients at that time. Rush began bleeding, in part because of cooler weather, on the 8th. Rush's treatment was calomel and jalap to purge the patient, which Dr. Kerr also advised. Purging was a violent evacuation of the body, "either up or down," as they used to say in the 18th century, and then after that the purge, broths, teas and other soothing medicines were prescribed. Obviously, doctors and medicines over 200 years ago were deficient. But it is unfair to misrepresent how doctors dealt with a patient. Today, a doctor often relies on medical tests to diagnose an illness. In 1793, there were no tests, only symptoms. After the epidemic Rush tried to simplify diagnosis, using the pulse, and simplify treatment, using principally harsh medicines and bleeding. In his account of the epidemic,

Rush went so far as to proclaim that training in the treatment of disease was "among the most essential articles of the knowledge and rights of man." He thought school children should be taught treatments for epidemic diseases. He claimed that, "All the knowledge that is necessary to discover when blood-letting is proper, might be taught to a boy or girl of twelve years old in a few hours." Well, obviously none of that came to pass, or else you'd be studying this chart from an old medical book!

Picture
Picture
Ironically modern medicine has used its superior knowledge of diseases to simplify its job. For example, if a doctor determines that a patient has a "viral infection" then there are no medicines prescribed, and the disease runs its course. Responding to symptoms only, eighteenth century doctors had a medicine for most everything. The modern approach can be risky if it leads to people taking virus too lightly. My four year old had a wicked bout of chicken pox, and at the time that was considered a mild childhood disease not warranting special treatment or even prevention. Then there were a lot more bad cases of chicken pox and that prompted doctors to develop a vaccine for that once benign childhood disease.

If Dr. Kerr acted responsibly, he would have paid very close attention to the symptoms of his patient. Visiting the patient more than twice a day was not out of question. In the early days when he was developing his remedies, Rush saw to it that his apprentice doctors kept patients under observation. Certainly a member of the family would be instructed on how to observe the patient and what to give to respond to what was going on. For example, Mrs. Cook would have been given calomel and jalap frequently until she was purged. However, whether she had an accompanying sweat was also important; as was the condition of her eyes, skin color, appetite. The pity of the 18th century was not that doctors were distant and dogmatic. The doctors were solicitous and caring. The pity was that their medicines were largely ineffective.

Mrs. Cook's trying to keep her daughter away was a common occurrence during the epidemic.

The Flight From Philadelphia

One of the great challenges of writing about the epidemic is how to describe what was happening in the city when it has been re-iterated over and over, since roughly August 30, 1793, that everyone who could fled from the city. Then there is another confusion. Much is made of armed guards keeping refugees from the epidemic away from outlying towns and villages. Then where did everyone leaving the city go?

And there is another way to look at it. The fever struck at the end of August, when not a few people generally were away to escape the heat of the city. In the case of the Rush family, mother and two daughters left the city for a vacation well before word of the epidemic. With news of the epidemic they did not return until November rather than sometime in September. Meanwhile Rush sent his sons to relatives in the country in late August.

I think we can take a common sense approach to this. Generally speaking, those in Philadelphia who had some relative or friend to go to just outside the city had no trouble leaving the city. Early in the epidemic, people probably could leave the city and find accommodations in country inns. When those became full, outlying towns had to fear an influx of possibly sick people with no place to go. In later epidemics the state solved this problem by creating tent cities for refugees near Philadelphia. At a certain point in 1793, roughly in the middle of September, it became widely held inside and outside the city that the city was so infected that anybody or anything coming from it had to be more or less quarantined. For that reason, many people in the city decided to stay so as not to embarrass friends and relatives.

Surprisingly, we cannot boldly state that at least no one came into the city after the middle of September. Philadelphia was the center of the Quaker faith in America. At the end of September they always held their "Yearly Meeting" in Philadelphia. So, at the height of the epidemic, Quakers came to Philadelphia to discuss the affairs of their religious society. They thought not to do so would be trying to thwart God's will, for He might have visited the city with pestilence, in part, to test the faith of Quakers.

All that said, I would suspect that if the Cooks had a definite place to go to, they could have easily made it to Gwyned. However, according to Mathew Carey's account of the epidemic, written in 1793, at some time during the crisis every road from the city was blocked.

Bush Hill

The controversy over the best way to treat yellow fever has become one of the most remembered aspects of the epidemic. From the first instant histories to those written in the past few years, the battle between the doctors has been recounted. Modern historians usually can't resist taking sides, always at the expense of Dr. Benjamin Rush's therapies of purging and bleeding. Rush was very much responsible for this because he did not suffer to apply his remedies in silence. He so trumpeted the virtues of purging and bleeding that doctors ever since have been accusing him of killing his patients. Fever 1793 comes down on the side of Rush's opponents.

Unfortunately the critique of Rush is not strictly accurate. While Dr. Deveze did oppose Rush's approach, it was not bleeding per se that he objected to. In his memoir of the epidemic, Deveze describes how he frequently bled patients when their symptoms required it. How Deveze differed from Rush is that he did not take as much blood out at each bleeding, and he avoided violent purgatives. When patients' symptoms became grave, Deveze's extreme measure was to apply hot bricks to the extremities as well as greater uses of poultices to raise the skin in blisters. Applying those to the head required that the patient's hair by shaved off.

In Fever 1793, Matilda has her illness between September 12 and 20. The courageous exploits of Stephen Girard in making the hospital a place where people wanted to come, actually began on September 12. It took him several days to arrange it so Dr. Deveze would be in charge. He came to the hospital on the 16th and had complete control of medical operations on the 21st when the young American doctors were relieved of their duties. By the way, running such a hospital was not a desirable job for doctors. Deveze replaced four young Americans who visited the hospital periodically. Hospitals in those days were only for the poor; the poor were the principal victims in any epidemic; hence, a doctor worried about his reputation, stayed away from fever hospitals! Dr. Deveze had been in the city a little over a month and it would have been difficult for him to attract patients. He was ideal for the hospital. He did soon get an American associate, Dr. Duffield.

Matilda awoke as the nurse Mrs. Field tried to feed her. Going over my notes just now, I found an interesting note in the Minutes of the Committee in charge of the hospital. They passed a rule that a doctor would give food to each patient each day. This highlights the importance of food and drink in the treatment of disease at that time. (It also may have been a ploy to force the American doctors to resign. They insisted that after daily visits the nurses could be trusted to administer medicines!) Even Dr. Rush, who tried to simplify treatment, has particular ideas about which broths and drinks were best given to patients.

Matilda leaves the hospital on September 24, twelve days after the on-set of her disease. Judging from the hospital records, other patients had similar experiences. However, others stayed in much longer. In 1793 there seemed to be three types of yellow fever cases: those who took it lightly and suffered some ill effects for a day or so; those who died within the first three days; and those who took a decided turn for the worse after the third day or so. Of course, many of the latter eventually died. Now, as I go through the collection of letters and memoirs I have about the epidemic, I'm curious if anyone who suffered the disease as severely as Matilda evidently did was able to be as active as she was in the rest of the book.

The Return to Philadelphia

During Matilda's cart ride to the orphanage Mrs. Bowles, a Quaker matron, told her "The streets of Philadelphia are more dangerous than your darkest nightmare. Fever victims lay in the gutters, thieves and wild men lurk on every corner. The markets have little food. You can't wander. If you are determined to return home with your grandfather, then you must stay there until the fever abates." Matilda does and her grandfather dies as a result of their fighting off two men trying to rob the coffeehouse.

Most descriptions of the city at this time highlight how quiet and empty the city was. Many described the city as being much like it was on a very quiet Sunday. Remarkably a number of city services remained. The Mayor and his special committee of volunteers met every day, and people could go there for help burying the dead, getting the sick to Bush Hill, or simply getting money or bread that the committee provided. The members of the committee also made visits to the homes of the sick to offer help. This was, indeed, amazing volunteer heroism and some the committee members died of the fever. The banks remained open, as did newspapers. The mail was delivered and when the mailmen became ill, letters could be picked up and dropped off at the Post Office. Because the mail service continued we have such a rich historical record of the epidemic. The city kept watchmen on the streets at night, their number augmented by volunteers. I believe the lamplighters continued to light the lamps. In his memoir Rush noted those professions that seemed to escape the disease: "three butchers only, out of nearly one hundred who remained in the city, died with the disease. Many of them attended the markets every day. Two painters, who worked at their business during the whole time of the prevalence of the fever, and in exposed situations, escaped it. Out of forty scavengers who were employed in collecting and carrying away the dirt of the streets, only one was affected by the fever and died...."

During the epidemic there were rumors of crime, but afterwards it was generally agreed that there were only two burglaries of empty houses, and both were minor. Philadelphians suffered immeasurably during the epidemic but crime did not add to their suffering. During most of September there were church services.

The African-American Nurses

Nursing was, and remains, crucial in the treatment of yellow fever. Early in the epidemic, Benjamin Rush explained to the leaders of Philadelphia's African American community that according to observations made during a yellow fever epidemic in Charleston some 50 years before, blacks did not get the fever. (Actually only those who had spent some time in Africa or the West Indies might have been immune, and many African Americans got the fever.) So Richard Allen, Absalom Jones and William Gray offered to provide nurses for the sick and to provide men to remove and carry the dead to burial grounds. Families could obtain nurses by applying to the Mayor. The demand became so great and the duties were so demanding that nurses were paid.

From the letters I've read, it seems that these nurses were most valuable in sitting up with patients through the night. Of course, since they were paid by the patient's family, the nurses generally stayed with that patient until no longer needed. It's possible that there were people like Eliza who visited several patients a day providing what help they could, but as best as I can tell, women nurses generally stayed with one patient. There were many male nurses, too. Richard Allen and Absalom Jones, on the advice of Benjamin Rush, visited many patients and bled them. There was a shortage of professional bleeders during the epidemic. Finally a group of men specialized in removing the bodies of the dead. Incidently, I've seen nothing written at the time that suggests that the old refrain from the plague-days of England, "Bring Out Your Dead," was ever used in Philadelphia in 1793.

The End of the Epidemic

The most difficult days of the epidemic were the first two weeks in October. The daily death toll reached its peak of 119 on October 11. Chilly nights, though no freeze, didn't seem to slow down the epidemic. Then came cold nights, and people did indeed push their furniture and beds out doors to rid them of infection. However, the mosquito that spreads yellow fever can be a house mosquito so some people did get the disease after the freezing nights.

In her book Anderson makes the arrival of President Washington the signal of a return to normality. Governor Mifflin returned to the city several days before Washington. And most importantly, ships began moving up to the quays at the port and unloading their goods before either of those leaders returned. Today, government seems a full time operation. In 1793, Congress was in session from December until the late Spring. The state legislature met only a few weeks. The Mayor of Philadelphia never left the city. So, the most important symbol of health was the return to commercial business. As I understand it, Washington came to Germantown on November 1, to reassemble his cabinet, and came into Philadelphia for the day on November 11, against the advice of his advisors.

Many sources say that all officers of the federal government fled the city. Actually some Treasury Department clerks remained, and wrote several letters describing their ordeal. They tried to get to and from their offices without passing a coffin on the street or any sick person. In a sense that sums up the tragedy of the epidemic. People were torn between the need for isolation for their own survival and the need to help their suffering neighbors. Most chose the former path and so for most the epidemic, far from being the harrowing adventure that Matilda experienced, was a time of intense loneliness. Even in the letters of those families that stayed together, where parents and children stayed together, there comes across a sense of lonely waiting. Then sickness arrives and all is action and anxiety.
Of course, people who write long letters that are apt to be preserved for many years, are usually thoughtful rather than active people. So it is difficult to reconstruct the experiences of the thousands of apprentices left behind by their masters; of the thousands of workers with no jobs to go to; and of the thousands of families who found themselves huddled in the tiny rooms trying to survive.

Judging from Philadelphia's reaction to later epidemics in 1797, 1798, and 1799, the community did not wish to replicate the loneliness of 1793. Evacuation of the city became the watchword and city officials sought to make it organized and highly social. Tent cities were created with the crowding and camaraderie so familiar in today's refugee crises. In 1793 only Bush Hill hospital and the orphan house represented a communal response to a common enemy.

So as a historian I find faults with Fever 1793. But as a human being I applaud its effort to highlight community and hope.

Bob Arnebeck


The constellations

8/28/2024

 

Orion

Picture
The famous Orion, the hunter, constellation is easy to find in the night sky because of the three stars in his belt, and the bright stars Betelgeuse and Rigel near his shoulder and foot. Orion is shown facing the constellation Taurus, the Bull, which hints that Orion might be based on the Sumerian hero Gilgamesh or the Greek hero Heracles, who both fought bulls. Orion’s many stories tell of his skill as a brave hunter, but he died because he was too proud. In one story, Orion bragged that he could kill any animal on Earth, which either made the Earth angry, or Artemis, the goddess of hunting, was upset. To punish Orion, the Earth sent a scorpion to sting him, and he died from the sting. Because of this, Orion and the scorpion constellations are on opposite sides of the sky, making it look like Orion is running away as the scorpion rises in the east.

Pegasus

Picture
According to the Greek myth, after Perseus defeated Medusa by cutting off her head, Pegasus came out of her neck and flew away. Some stories say that Perseus was actually riding Pegasus when he saved Andromeda, but usually, Pegasus is linked to the hero Bellerophon. Zeus also used Pegasus to carry his thunderbolts. Even though we only see the front half of Pegasus in the night sky, it is the seventh-largest constellation in the northern sky. Long ago, the constellation was made up of a “square of Pegasus,” which was a group of four bright stars. However, now one of those stars, near Pegasus' belly, has been given to the nearby constellation Andromeda and is called Alpha Andromedae, so only three stars remain in the well-known square.

Leo

Picture
When Heracles went temporarily mad because of the goddess Hera, he accidentally killed his wife and children. To make up for these terrible actions, he was given 12 very hard tasks to complete. The first task was to kill the Nemean lion, a scary creature with a tough hide that liked to attack the people living nearby. Heracles managed to defeat the lion by hugging it tightly and squeezing it to death. The constellation Leo represents this fierce lion. It has six stars in an arc shape that shows the lion's front body and head, ready to pounce. The brightest star in this arc is called Regulus, which means “little king.”

Phoenix

Picture
The Phoenix, located near the constellation Eridanus, refers to the mythical, multicolored bird that is able to rise from the ashes of its predecessor.  Ankaa, the Arabic name of the constellation’s largest star, means phoenix.

Ursa Major

Picture
Ursa Major, also known as the Great Bear, has seven stars that form its back and tail. You might know it better as the Big Dipper because its stars look like a ladle or a drinking gourd. Four stars make the cup part, and three stars make the handle.
The story behind the name Ursa Major is more complicated. In a book called Metamorphosis, the writer Ovid tells a story about a huntress named Callisto. She promised to stay loyal to the goddess Artemis, but Zeus tricked her by pretending to be Artemis. Callisto ended up having a son named Arcas. When Zeus’ wife Hera found out, she turned Callisto into a bear. Later, Arcas, not knowing the bear was his mother, tried to hunt her. To stop this tragedy, Zeus turned Callisto into the constellation Ursa Major and Arcas into another constellation called Boötes, the Herdsman.

Andromeda

Picture
Andromeda was the daughter of Queen Cassiopeia and King Cepheus. Her parents chained her to a rock in the sea as a sacrifice to the sea monster Cetus. Things seemed dire for Andromeda until Perseus, a hero who had just defeated the gorgon Medusa, flew down from the sky and saved her.

The constellation Andromeda used to share its main star, Alpha Andromedae (also called Alpheratz), with the nearby constellation Pegasus. The Andromeda Galaxy, which is part of the Andromeda constellation, is 2.5 million light-years away from Earth and is the farthest object in space that we can see without a telescope.

<<Previous

    Author 

    I often struggle to find websites with thorough explanations in simple language to help kids understand historical events or scientific concepts, so I decided to create some of my own!

    Archives

    December 2025
    September 2025
    December 2024
    August 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    August 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    February 2022
    April 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    August 2016
    January 2016
    July 2015
    May 2015

    RSS Feed